Special ethics for women? Just my take…
17 Jan
Special ethics for women- no… dangerous thought – yes….
Ah yes we are different – men and women. Waller tells us so on pg 121 where he describes drug testing. It nice to be put on a pedestal of sorts, but at what cost? If a drug dosage is appropriate for a man – it does not mean without a doubt it is failsafe for a woman. Therefore in this situation and in many others – we all need to be held to the same standard. I like this example because it shows both sides of the argument. Protection of the possible unborn – but then leads us down a blind path as far as medical treatment with women.
If we want equal – we should be equal – we are all special. There is always a danger when any special rights are given to any one “group”, “race” or “culture”.
It is however, a fine line between right and wrong and moral virtue Vs equality in dealing with care ethics. Women’s rights have long been a source of debate. It seems that whenever there has been a long road traveled that the circumstances are treated with kid gloves. Even with racial issues – the more we treat with special consideration, the more we segregate, and the more “special” the ethical treatment becomes, the less “special” the other side ends up being.
I like going back here to Rawls’ Veil of Ignorance (pg 73) this theory is a good way, in my opinion to look at fair treatment.
I would hope that someday – we can all be special and equal. Let us treat each other with proper morality and be a world full of character and honor.
Waller, Bruce. 2008. Consider Ethics. Pearson Education
http://www.amazon.com/Consider-Ethics-Theory-Readings-Contemporary/dp/0321202805







